Comments on: Maybe they should call them, “Formal Wins” ? https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2014/08/15/maybe-they-should-call-them-formal-wins/ Wed, 21 Sep 2022 16:10:43 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 By: Jon https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2014/08/15/maybe-they-should-call-them-formal-wins/#comment-372283 Thu, 05 Mar 2015 22:48:14 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=8432#comment-372283 I loved this post! A brilliant analogy. Very illuminating, and fun, too! Thanks!

]]> By: James https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2014/08/15/maybe-they-should-call-them-formal-wins/#comment-244166 Mon, 18 Aug 2014 19:48:31 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=8432#comment-244166 In reply to Chris.

Oh, I’m sorry – here’s a picture of a Clayton Kershaw up close, about 5 years ago. https://www.flickr.com/photos/25123490@N07/2370398543/ The current version has a bit more facial hair but is still recognizable. : – )

]]> By: mevans https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2014/08/15/maybe-they-should-call-them-formal-wins/#comment-242210 Mon, 18 Aug 2014 00:25:17 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=8432#comment-242210 Go Braves! :-)

]]> By: Chris https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2014/08/15/maybe-they-should-call-them-formal-wins/#comment-237412 Sat, 16 Aug 2014 03:21:20 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=8432#comment-237412 I understood formal charge before, but now I’m totally confused. If you are going to write an article with all this confusing terminology, at least link the terms to a wikipedia article of something. How is the average chemistry student suppose to know what a Clayton Kershaw is?

]]>